Justia – an extensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, in addition to case regulation at both the federal and state levels.
A guide to online and print sources of Washington State court opinions, rules, forms, and jury instructions
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is really a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; If your parents with the boy or girl will not approve of this sort of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they are able to do if they can Slash off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this sort of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Woman who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman who's a major, the couple is neither harassed by anybody nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives these threats or harasses or commits acts of violence possibly himself or at his instigation, is taken to process by instituting criminal proceedings from the police against these types of persons and further stern action is taken against these person(s) as provided by regulation.
The a good amount of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it is made crystal clear that police is free to acquire action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities subject matter to law. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. In the event the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, they usually shall be assigned non-area duties from the interim period. Read more
The official court record is maintained from the court of record. Copies of case file documents usually are not accessible around the search site and will need to generally be ordered from the court of record.
While there is not any prohibition against referring to case law from a state other than the state in which the case is being listened to, it holds little sway. Still, if there isn't any precedent inside the home state, relevant case law from another state could possibly be viewed as through the court.
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the weight supplied to any reported judgment could depend on the reputation of both the reporter along with the judges.[7]
eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this can be a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; When the parents in the boy or Lady don't approve of these kinds of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the utmost they're able to do if they're able to Lower off social relations with the son or even the daughter, However they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this sort of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or guy who is a major, the pair is neither harassed by any one nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who offers these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to process by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against these kinds of persons and further stern action is taken against this sort of person(s) as provided by legislation.
163 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's perfectly-settled that even though contemplating the case of standard promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has got to evaluate the benefit of all the suitable candidates and after owing deliberations, to grant promotion to such qualified candidates who are found being most meritorious amongst them. Considering that the petitioner was held being senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was dismissed from the respondent department just to increase favor on the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy on the part with the respondent department.
139 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Referring to the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 on the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is not served, the grievance petition may be dismissed. This is because service from the grievance notice is really a mandatory necessity as well as a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The legislation needs that a grievance notice be served on the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. In the event the employer fails to reply or resolve the read more grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) if the organization is transprovincial.
For that reason, this petition is hereby disposed of inside the terms stated above. However no harassment shall be caused to both party as well as the case shall be decided with the competent court of legislation if pending. Read more
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability while in the matter, but couldn't be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making such a ruling, the defendants took their request for the appellate court.
Since the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been arrived at, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) in the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Free database for searching federal court dockets and documents pulled from PACER. Coverage isn't extensive, but this is a superb starting point. See Background section at base of RECAP website for more information.